and 4,000 children. Their distribution by county and the per- centage they formed in each, were as follows: | | : County. No. Per Cent. County. No. Per Cent. Los Angeles .............. 11,500 Do KANE seas eect ances ee 500 3.1 | San Francisco .......... 6,900 i. Butte...) eee 400 LT Sacramento .................. 6,000 8.0 San Bernardino .......... 400 9.0 Alameda’ f. 25.0)... 4,400 8. ‘San ‘Diego 22. 400 0.6 San Joaquin .............. 4,300 8:0! Yuba. 233.45) ee 400 4.1 Santa Clara «2.2.2... 3,100 3:9. Imperial 9.2.2.2... 360 2.7 ISVOSHO\ toe 3,000 4.0 San Mateo ........0000...... 350 1.3 VoOl@) ony eee fi eee 1,500 9:0 Colusa 2:22.22. 23 350 7.0 Contra Costa ............ 1,000 3.8 San Luis Obispo ........ 300 = PIACGY 2 ee 1,000 sos |) SUUCEr <2... 300 5.1 Oraneepe eee 990 2.6). Kern: 2.2. 340 0.6 Santa Barbara .......... 960 34 Tehama. .2.....2.232 200 1.9 Sonoma. 722 see se 880 1.8 Stanislaus .................... 190 0.8 Santa) Cruz :s°2.0e2-e- 860 i... Merced - ..2.2:22.:eeee 150 £2 Monterey .................... 780 2 an Benito 2 150 Be ALUN C Woee sci s cee: (80° 232° “Napa S822 eee 100 Solano 022.203 700 2:5.) Others: 2..:...232 eee 40 | Ventura 670 nd ——— | RIVeGrsid @s ee 650 ws Total. 22.00.02 55,000 2.1 First of all, according to the above table, Japanese are scat- tered all over the State. However, Los Angeles County con- tained the largest number, which was 11,500, while San Francisco and Sacramento the next largest number of Japanese. Alameda and San Joaquin contained little over 4,000 each, while Santa Clara and Fresno about 3,000 each. Three counties, Yolo, Contra Costa and Placer had about 1,000 each. Their number gradually diminish in the remaining counties. However, the percentage they formed of the entire population in each county does not follow the same order of their actual number. Thus in Yolo they formed 9 per cent, which was the highest, and in Sacra- mento and San Joaquin 8 per cent, which was the next highest. In Los Angeles they formed but 2.2 per cent, while in San Fran- cisco 1.6 per cent. In no case then had they formed more than 9 per cent of the entire population even by counties. The principal cities containing Japanese and the percentage they formed of the total population of each were as follows: ’ ! | City. No. Per Cent. City. No. Per Cent. | Los Angeles .............. 7,938 25} San Jose ........cee 790 82.6 | San Francisco .......... 6,988 16° Alameda 2.2.22. 692 3.0 | Sacramento ..............-- 2,452 5.6 Berkeley <2--cc-:c-.-0c 686 Le | Oaldand ee as 1,835 1.2. ‘Stbekton .........22 495 2.1 | 24 | . | SoS: