per cent received from $1.50 to $1.75, inclusive.”*> And that was the situation in 1909. Now, “two dollars is the usual rate for picking fruit and berries in every locality visited, and the wage for packers is usually somewhat higher. Lower payment of Japanese than of white men engaged in the same occupations is almost entirely a matter of the past. Piece rates, so important in harvest work and the almost universal rule in the cultivation and harvesting of sugar beets, are not only uniform for ‘white’ and Japanese laborers, but they have shown a tendency about Fresno and in other localities visited, to increase somewhat. Here and there the Mexicans are proving to be the best bidders for such work and undertake it for less money than the Japanese.’’? It is needless to be added that “ white employers nearly always prefer white “men as teamsters and usually state that they would prefer white : men for all work, but the Japanese are better workers than the irregular white men usually available for hand work.” ? Japanese Farmers. There is a general misconception, indeed, an apprehension as ‘regards Japanese farming in California, owing partly to the complicated systems under which Japanese cultivate land, but largely to the purposely exaggerated statements frequently asserted by the interested parties, the Asiatic Exclusion League to-wit. We will first examine the facts. Soon after Japanese began to work on ranches, white farmers applied to the Japanese the systems under which Chinese cultivated land. The first of these was “contract” system, under which Japanese boss or bosses were bound to furnish necessary labor throughout the season of }a given industry at a previously fixed price. The second was | share system, which is not the same as metayage, for under it | che proprietor held an absolute control over the management of | he farm. It only differs from contract system in that under this ‘olan the leasor and lessee share alike profits and losses under | stipulated conditions. Cash leasing did not begin till about 1900. 5 Immigration Commission, Ibid., p. 65. 1 Millis, Ibid., p. 124. 2 Immigration Commision Reports, Vol. 23, p. 68. 35