who will come by limiting the opportunities for their activity here when they arrive.” + “Tn other words,” says Dr. Gulick, “this is an indirect legislation for the control of immigration and looks toward the exclusion of those Japanese already owning real estate in California.” ? Another writer says, the law is unjust, impolitic, and unnecessary. “It is unjust because it takes advantages of discrimination under the naturalization law to further discriminate between aliens of different races lawfully in this country. It limits the property rights of those who must remain aliens and safeguards those of others who might, but do not, become citizens. It changes the law with reference to the ownership of the soil which no doubt furnished a motive for some to immigrate. Moreover, as the representatives of the Japanese government have pointed out on many occasions, subjects of the United States are not only ac- corded the same property rights as other aliens in Japan, but these rights are extensive. Though aliens may not own land in fee simple because the government has not as yet placed in effect a law passed by the Japanese Parliament in 1910, conferring that right, they may lease land for such long periods and under such conditions that the difference is not great. Hence the Californian | is not reciprocal.” “The law is impolitic because it is opposed to the spirit and fun- damental principles of amity and good understanding, upon which ‘the conventional relations of the two nations depend. It is the kind of legislation that retards and interferes with commercial ‘relations, and no large part of the foreign commerce to which ‘California is a party is with Japan. The development of closer ‘commercial relations with Japan and other eastern Asiatic coun- tries should be cherished, and not retarded and interfered with.” “Finally, investigation makes it evident that ownership carries with it the closest approach to American standards and the best 1 Speech by Attorney-General Webb before the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco, August 9, 1913, quoted by Gulick in his American- Japanese Problem, p. 189. 2 Ibid. 63